Pages for the work you want to win
Service and sector pages with a point of view: who it is for, what the engagement looks like, what you will not take on. Selection is a feature. Ranking for everything is how you drown.
Accountancy practices · United Kingdom
The firms that grow are not the ones shouting “tax return from £99”. They are the ones a director finds when they search for a specific problem, and the ones an AI assistant names because the website actually explains the work. That is a content and structure problem, not a logo problem.
If every page says you are friendly, proactive and partner-led, you are invisible. Making Tax Digital, contractor IR35, property, VAT on the threshold, year-end for an owner-managed company — those are the searches. Most accountancy websites still hide them under “our services” with a stock calculator graphic.
Service and sector pages with a point of view: who it is for, what the engagement looks like, what you will not take on. Selection is a feature. Ranking for everything is how you drown.
Town and catchment pages only where you genuinely serve. Maps, profile hygiene, and a practice entity that Google can attach to reviews and to the partners’ names.
MTD, Companies House filings, bookkeeping cadence, software you actually support. Written so a model can quote you and a client can forward the page to their co-director.
Forms and calls-to-action that ask the two or three questions a partner needs before a scoping call. SEO that only produces tire-kickers is a cost centre.
Start with an audit if the site is “fine” and the pipeline is not. If the architecture cannot carry specialist pages, we will say so and quote a rebuild in the mid-project range rather than bolting blogs onto a dead template.
Referrals remain the backbone for many firms. Search is how the rest of the market checks you after the referral, and how strangers with good work find you at all. The two are not rivals.
No. MTD belongs on the pages where it is the point. Spreading it like garnish is how you look like everyone else and help nobody.
Yes. We do not need to replace your stack. The site should explain it and hand off cleanly — not compete with it.
By being explicit about minimums, specialisms and who you are for. Ambiguous friendliness is what invites the wrong work. Clear pages are a filter.
Next step
Audits from about £700. Websites about £2–3k. Retainers from about £750/month. If a rebuild is the better path, we will say so before anyone is out of pocket.